PQIA’s mission is to serve
the consumer of lubricants by testing and reporting
on the quality and integrity of lubricants in the
marketplace.
It
is expected that this improved visibility of quality will
lead to wider conformance by lubricant manufacturers to
specification and performance claims.
The Petroleum
Quality Institute of America
serves buyers and
consumers of lubricants through
the support of:
Lubricant Distributor
Supporters
CODE OF ETHICAL
BUSINESS CONDUCT
The Petroleum Quality
Institute of America (PQIA) Code of Ethical Business
Conduct (Code) is the cornerstone of the PQIA
initiative as it clearly and strictly defines the
standards by which PQIA and its management, employees,
and supporter (“Supporters”) will conduct business in
the lubricants marketplace.
PQIA ADVISORY BOARD
The Petroleum Quality Institute of America's
Advisory Board comprises a distinguished group of
professionals with prominence in a broad range of
fields in the lubricants business.
The role of the Advisory Board is to provide PQIA's
management with guidance, advice, recommendations
and counsel in how to best pursue PQIA's purpose and
mission.
Click on the bookmarks above to view all the samples tested by PQIA.
Motor Oil Specifications - The Process of Change
June 13, 2018
Motor Oil Specifications - The Process of Change
by
Thomas F. Glenn
Thomas F. Glenn, President, Petroleum Quality Institute of America
The PQIA has recently fielded many questions about the new API SN Plus Service Category and although some are technical, many others we received are more general and look to understand why specifications change and how the new specifications come about. The short answer why they change can be summed up by pointing to the following drivers:
Government regulations mandating improvements in emissions and fuel economy performance
Continuous evolution in engine hardware
Performance issues with current specifications
Interest in higher performance, longer lasting lubricants, and other consumer and OEM based benefits
Although other factors sometimes come into play (i.e. availability of engine parts for testing), government regulations and changes in hardware are the leading reasons new engine oil performance specifications are introduced.
To meet the challenges of these changes, engine manufacturers will sometimes look to additive companies and lubricant manufacturers for fluid solutions. This can result in new specifications and approvals. The process to bring new specifications to the market is complex and varies somewhat between gasoline and diesel engine approvals. This article focuses on the gasoline engine oil approval process.
Click for More
Consumer Alerts Issued on Five Motor Oils
June 11, 2018
The Petroleum Quality Institute of America (PQIA) continues to observe two brands of motor oils in the market that consumers should watch out for and steer clear of. The brands are:
Mileage 365
Q Motor Oil
The result of the tests conducted on samples of these brands show products that can cause harm to virtually any car or truck currently on the road.
The products tested lack any meaningful level of additives to protect engines from wear, sludge, and corrosion. Further, the levels of silicon, copper, and iron in the products indicate they may contain used oil and abrasive material. In addition to these issues, the products are labeled in such a way that a reasonable consumer could believe they are multi-grade motor oils when in fact the actual viscosity range listed on the back labels is not consistent with any multi-viscosity motor oil as defined by SAE J300. It should also be noted that the labels fail to display an API Service Category or any other performance specification that would provide consumers with the information needed to make an informed buying decision.
Click for More
CLICK BOTTLES BELOW FOR ASSESSMENT DETAILS
Results in on Three 5W-20s and Three 5W-30s
June 1, 2018
The Petroleum Quality Institute of America tested three brands of SAE 5W-20 and three brands of SAE 5W-30 motor oil. The results of the tests conducted on samples of the brands meet the SAE J300 specifications for the SAE Viscosity Grade listed on the product label, and are consistent with the listed API Service Categories.
The Petroleum Quality Institute of America (PQIA) fielded a number of calls and emails following publication of test results for three brands of antifreeze (also known as coolants) last week. In addition to expressing dismay about the product (click for details) on the retail shelf with only 8% ethylene glycol and a freeze point of positive 27°F, several who reached out to PQIA also had questions about the differences in the colors of products in the market. Understandably, this is a common question since coolants are available in a relatively wide range of colors and the colors are often associated with significant differences in price. As an example, the price of green coolant can be nearly half the price of pink.
So, what’s the difference? As one caller asked, “Why would anyone want to pay twice the price for one color coolant instead of another since they all offer nearly the same freeze protection?”CLICK FOR MORE
Results in on Three Coolant Samples; One Raises Eyebrows
May 11, 2018
While the PQIA examined two brands of coolant and found no issues, one product on the store shelves set off alarms. The product is labeled as “HeatWave Universal Summer Coolant.”
HeatWave Universal Summer Coolant
Test results show that HeatWave Universal Summer Coolant will not protect an engine from freeze damage at temperatures below 27°F and will not provide adequate boil-over protection due to its low (8%) concentration of ethylene glycol. Although the product makes no ASTM or freeze point claims, a prediluted ethylene glycol base coolant formulated to meet ASTM D-3306* (which is an industry standard) contains 50% ethylene glycol which protects down to -33.5°F.
In addition to freeze point, there are other issues of concern.
Click Here for More
Two Coolant Samples with No Issues
May 11, 2018
The freeze point of samples tested for the brands shown below meet the products’ labeled claims and based on the tests conducted, there are no issues with the quality of the products.
CLICK BOTTLES BELOW FOR
DETAILS
Results in on Three 5W-20s
May 1, 2018
The Petroleum Quality Institute of America tested three brands of SAE 5W-20 motor oil. The results of the tests conducted on samples of the brands meet the SAE J300 specifications for the SAE Viscosity Grade listed on the product label, and are consistent with the listed API Service Categories.
The Petroleum Quality Institute of America (PQIA) is pleased to announce updates to its Quick Reference Guides for passenger car engine oil (PCEO) and heavy-duty diesel engine oil (HDEO) timelines. In addition to including the new API SN Plus specification for PCEO, the timelines are expanded to include ILSAC and General Motors dexos® specifications and additional detail as to applications.
The PQIA timelines provide a quick and easy to use reference to help installers, retailers, consumers, and others understand and identify current API Service Categories, ILSAC designations and dexos® specifications. Importantly, they also help buyers to distinguish products with current specifications from those with prior and/or obsolete specifications.
CLICK FOR MORE
Results in on Three 0W-20s and One 10W-30 Motor Oils
April 16, 2018
The Petroleum Quality Institute of America tested three brands of SAE 0W-20 and one brand of SAE 10W-30 motor oil. The results of the tests conducted on samples of the brands meet the SAE J300 specifications for the SAE Viscosity Grade listed on the product label, and are consistent with the listed API Service Categories.
CLICK BOTTLES BELOW FOR
DETAILS
Times are Changing!
April 10, 2018
GET READY FOR SN PLUS
The Petroleum Quality Institute of America (PQIA) has been analyzing engine oil samples since 2009. Over that time, we have tested many brands, the majority of which have no issues; they meet their viscosity claims and are consistent with the API Service Categories on the labels. Unfortunately, however, we have also seen a significant number of brands with deficiencies, and some that are so far off the mark they will cause harm to engines. While PQIA will continue to inform consumers about motor oils that have no issues, and those that fail to meet their claims and/or can cause equipment harm, this article is written to help educate consumers about an important change taking place in motor oils they should be aware of. This change speaks to the new API SN Plus Service Category for passenger car motor oils (PCMO) and how it will likely be seen in the sample analysis data PQIA reports.
Click for
More
Results in on Four 5W-30 Motor Oils
April 6, 2018
The Petroleum Quality Institute of America tested four brands of 5W-30 motor oil (three synthetics and one conventional). The results of the tests conducted on samples of the brands meet the SAE J300 specifications for the SAE Viscosity Grade listed on the product label, and are consistent with the listed API Service Categories.
CLICK BOTTLES
BELOW FOR DETAILS
Buyer Beware! PQIA Issues a DON’T BUY on Spirit Oil MD-III
April 5, 2018
SPIRIT OIL MD-III
Are you putting motor oil in your transmission or transmission fluid in your engine?
There is a lubricant currently on the shelves in the Midwest that has caught the attention of the Petroleum Quality Institute of America (PQIA), and for good reason. The product is
Spirit Oil MD-III from Spirit Oil Company and it is a product PQIA recommends consumers
DON’T BUY.
Click for More
Four High Mileage Motor Oils Tested
March 27, 2018
The Petroleum Quality Institute of America tested four “High Mileage” motor oil brands. The results of the tests conducted on samples of the brands meet the SAE J300 specifications for the SAE Viscosity Grade listed on the product label, and are consistent with the listed API Service Categories.
CLICK BOTTLES
BELOW FOR DETAILS
Georgia On the Same Page as Missouri Regarding the use of “303” on THF Labels
March 27, 2018
As reported by PQIA on February 12, 2018, the Georgia Department of Agriculture, Fuel and Measures Division issued a Stop Sale Order for Tractor Hydraulic Fluid (THF) products in the market labeled, claimed or implied as only meeting the THF “303” designation. The department determined that all THF 303 labeled products shall be removed from sale in Georgia within 180 days of the date of the order.
CLICK FOR MORE
"303" GONE, BUT, NOT FORGOTTEN
March 16, 2018
The Petroleum Quality Institute of America (PQIA) received a number of phone calls over the past month about some of the new labels seen on pails of Tractor Hydraulic Fluid (THF) in the two states (Georgia and Missouri) that issued stop sale orders on "303" tractor hydraulic fluid. Of concern is that although stop sale orders have been issued, the new labels continue to display "303." The PQIA looked into this and here is what we found.
CLICK FOR
MORE
Four OEM Motor Oils Tested
March 2, 2018
The Petroleum Quality Institute of America tested four "Genuine" motor oil brands. The results of the tests conducted on samples of the brands meet the SAE J300 specifications for the SAE Viscosity Grade listed on the product label, and are consistent with the listed API Service Categories.
Results in on Three Antifreeze/Coolants
February 28, 2018
The Petroleum Quality Institute of America tested three brands of Antifreeze/Coolant. The freeze point of the samples tested meet the products’ labeled claims and based on the tests conducted, there are no issues with the quality of the products.
CLICK
BOTTLES BELOW FOR
DETAILS
Results in on Three 5W-30s and One
15W-40
February 20, 2018
The Petroleum Quality Institute of America tested three brands of 5W-30 and one brand of
15W-40 motor oils. The results of the tests conducted on samples of the brands meet the SAE J300 specifications for the SAE Viscosity Grade listed on the product label, and are consistent with the listed API Service Categories.
CLICK
BOTTLES BELOW FOR
DETAILS
Georgia Issues Stop Sale Order for All J303 Tractor Hydraulic Fluid
February 12, 2018
The Georgia Department of Agriculture, Fuel & Measures Division has issued a Stop Sale Order for Tractor Hydraulic Fluids (THF) products in the market labeled, claimed or implied as meeting the THF "303" specification.
The Georgia Department of Agriculture is responsible for insuring that all lubricating oils, greases, and other similar products sold or offered for sale in the state of Georgia are properly labeled.
Pursuant to O.C.G.A. § 10-1-162(b) (3) "No person shall store, sell, expose, or offer for sale any liquid fuels, lubricating oils, greases, or other similar products... [i]n any manner whatsoever which may deceive or have the effect of deceiving the purchaser of such products as to the nature, price, quality, or quantity of products so stored, sold, exposed, or offered for sale"
The Department's Fuel & Measures division has issued a stop sale order for Tractor Hydraulic Fluids (THF) products labeled, claimed, or implied as meeting the THF "303" specification. The THF 303 specification was discontinued in 1974 and was subsequently replaced with the current JDM-J20C or D specifications. The department has determined that all THF 303 labeled products shall be removed from sale in Georgia within 180 days of the date of this order.
Provided, however, that nothing in this order shall prevent a manufacturer of such products from correcting product labeling and resuming the sale thereof after such products are validated as meeting the current JDM-J20C or D performance specifications. Performance specifications include but are not limited to those set by original equipment manufacturers and standards-setting organizations such as ASTM and/or SAE.
Georgia is the Second State to Issue a Stop Sale Order on J303 Tractor Hydraulic Fluid
Prior to today's announcement that Georgia has issued a stop sale order on J303 Tractor Hydraulic Fluid, the state of Missouri announced a stop sale order of J303 THF on
November 17, 2017.
While the action taken by the states of Georgia and Missouri certainly helps to protect farmers from obsolete THF, fluids bearing the J303 specification continue to be sold in other states. Based on the high level of agricultural activity of other states (see map), its clear that the presence of J303 in the market remains a significant concern.
Tractor Hydraulic Fluid Timeline
As stated in the Missouri Department of Agriculture Consumer Protection Alert when it issued a Stop Sale on 303 THF, "the John Deere (JD) 303 designation is 57 years old and has been obsolete for 43 years. In addition, there are no specifications available for 303 Tractor Hydraulic Fluids and, as such, products making only '303' claims cannot be tested to assure compliance with any known specifications."
See below for a simple to understand chart illustrating the timeline for John Deere THF specifications and where "303" fluids fit in.
Results in on Three 5W-20s and One 0W-20
February 8, 2018
The Petroleum Quality Institute of America tested three brands of 5W-20 and one brand of 0W-20 motor oils. The results of the tests conducted on samples of the brands meet the SAE J300 specifications for the SAE Viscosity Grade listed on the product label, and are consistent with the listed API Service Categories.
CLICK
BOTTLES BELOW FOR
DETAILS
Three OEM Motor Oils Tested: No Issues
January 23, 2018
The Petroleum Quality Institute of America tested three “Genuine” motor oil samples. The results of the tests conducted on the samples meet the SAE J300 specifications for the SAE Viscosity Grade listed on the product label, and are consistent with the listed API Service Categories.
CLICK FOR MORE
Two ATFs Tested: One with Labeling Issues
January 19, 2018
The Petroleum Quality Institute of America tested two sample of Automatic Transmission Fluid (ATF) and whereas the results of the tests conducted on these sample are consistent with their labeled claims, PQIA has concerns that the language on the back label of the Wolf’s Head DX III-H/M ATF does not advise consumers of its limited use and, instead could be misleading by stating that
“It has been formulated to meet the most recent transmission fluid specifications. Wolf’s Head DX III-H/M ATF should be used in most modern transmission because it provides…”
CLICK FOR MORE
Lyden Oil Company Joins to Support PQIA's Efforts to Help Assure the Quality and Integrity of Lubricants in the Market
January 18, 2018
The Petroleum Quality Institute of America (PQIA) is pleased to announce that Lyden Oil Company, one of the leading lubricant distributors in the United States, has joined PQIA's growing list of supporters committed to help assure the quality and integrity of lubricants in the market.
Laura Lyden, Lyden Oil Co. Sales & Operations Manager says, "Lyden Oil Company is proud to support PQIA's efforts because they are consistent with our focus on providing our customers with the highest Quality Products available in the marketplace. We feel that our support of PQIA gives our customers the additional assurance that our commitment to quality is being monitored by a third-party organization.
CLICK FOR MORE
The FTC Issues Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking; Request for Public Comment on Recycled Oil Rule
January 12, 2018
The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) requests public comment on the overall costs, benefits, and regulatory and economic impact of its rule specifying Test Procedures and Labeling Standards for Recycled Oil.
The Recycled Oil Rule contains testing and labeling requirements for recycled engine oil. The of the rule is to encourage used oil recycling, promote recycled oil use, reduce new oil consumption, and reduce environmental hazards and wasteful practices associated with used oil disposal.
CLICK FOR MORE
Selling Lubes in California – Summary of Rules and Regs
January 12, 2018
The California Department of Food & Agriculture (CDFA) published an excellent document this month that’s a must read for lubricant stakeholders doing business in the state. It’s also an invaluable resource for those looking to understand some of the laws and regulations that are embodied in the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Handbook 130, which are in effect in other states.
CLICK FOR MORE
Four More Motor Oils Tested: No Issues
January 10, 2018
The results of the tests conducted on samples of the brands below meet the SAE J300 specifications for the SAE Viscosity Grade listed on the product label, and are consistent with the listed API Service Categories.
CLICK FOR MORE
Consumer Alert: Petrola Motor Oil and ATF
December 28, 2017
The Petroleum Quality Institute of America recently shopped a convenience store in Ohio and found a brand on the shelves that consumers are advised not to buy. The product is labeled as "Petrola" and the samples tested include:
Use of these products in virtually any automobile currently on the road will likely cause harm to the engine or the transmission.
Further, if damage is done to a vehicle as a result of using these products, a consumer could have a tough row to hoe should they decide to seek recompense from the manufacturer or distributor of the product. This is because the labels on the products do not comply with the Fair Packaging and Labeling Act (FPLA), or the Uniform Packaging and Labeling Regulations, each of which require the product labels include a declaration of responsibility (name and address of manufacturer, packer, or distributor) of the product.
Although PQIA will bring this brand to the attention of the Ohio Department of Agriculture Weights & Measures, until they take action, consumers should be aware that these products are on the shelves and to avoid them.
Four More ATFs Tested: Always Read the Labels
December 15, 2017
The results of the tests conducted on samples of the brands shown below are consistent with their labeled claims.
The results of the tests conducted on this sample DO NOT meet the SAE J300 specifications for the SAE Viscosity
The results of the tests conducted on this sample DO NOT meet the SAE J300 specifications for the SAE Viscosity Grade listed on the product label, and ARE NOT consistent with API SC/CC Service Category claimed on the label. The Kinematic Viscosity @ 100°C is 63% lower than the minimum viscosity specification for this SAE grade. In addition, the organometallic additive levels in this sample are not typical of an SC/CC motor oil and if they were, it's important to note that the SC/CC service category is obsolete and is not suitable for use in automobile engines built after 1967. Use of such products can cause equipment harm to virtually all automobile engines currently on the road. The label on this product fails to give adequate warnings about its limited use. Further, the very high level of silicon in this sample indicates the product may be contaminated with abrasive material.
Tractor Hydraulic Fluid Timeline
November 28, 2017
The Petroleum Quality Institute of America (PQIA) received a considerable amount of feedback when we reported in our November 17th issue that the Missouri Department of Agriculture (MDA) removed "303" tractor hydraulic fluid (THF) from sale in the state. Nearly all who contacted PQIA expressed support of the MDA's decision and many feel this action should be implemented by other states in an effort to help protect farmers' equipment and level the playing field for marketers and retailers to compete. They add, however, that such implementation should allow time for marketers to cycle in current-spec products to avoid costly recalls.
CLICK TO ENLARGEA significant number of those who responded to PQIA's article agreed to the reasons the MDA removed 303 THF from sale. As made clear in the
MDA's Consumer Protection Alert, "The John Deere (JD) 303 designation is 57 years old and has been obsolete for 43 years. In addition, there are no specifications available for 303 Tractor Hydraulic Fluids and, as such, products making only '303' claims cannot be tested to assure compliance with any known specifications. This action is being taken to protect tractor owners from equipment damage."
Another issue that surfaced from the feedback PQIA receive is that many in- and outside of the lubricants business will benefit from a simple to understand chart illustrating the timeline for John Deere THF specifications and where "303" fluids fit in. In response, PQIA created the reference guide shown above.
Note: As stated in the Missouri Department of Agriculture Consumer Protection Alert, "Companies have been given the opportunity to revise their claims on the container to clearly identify the appropriate use of the product therein. The Department is working with manufacturers, distributors and retailers to ensure a low-cost product with accurate labeling is available in the State of Missouri."
Click for MDA Consumer Protection Alert
Missouri Orders 303 Tractor Hydraulic Fluids Out of the State
November 17, 2017
The State of Missouri Department of Agriculture Weights, Measures & Consumer Protection Division ordered that effective immediately Tractor Hydraulic Fluid (THF) labeled only as “303” can no longer be sold in the state, and the reason why is clear.
The John Deere (JD) 303 designation is 57 years old and has been obsolete for 43 years. In addition, there are no specifications available for 303 THF, and as such products making only “303” claims cannot be tested to assure compliance with any known specifications. Because of this, in the interest of protecting consumers, the State of Missouri ordered that “303” THF cannot be sold in the state.
Missouri’s banning the sale of “303” THF will have a significant impact due to the proliferation of 303 fluids in the market. These fluids are typically sold as low cost THFs and account for a very significant share of total THF sales. In fact, in some markets they are the leading type sold. Further, they are produced and sold by many lubricant manufacturers, marketers and retailers in the US and some have already received Stop Sale orders from the State of Missouri Department of Agriculture Weights, Measures & Consumer Protection Division.
Although not necessarily a shot heard around the world, the actions taken by the state of Missouri will most certainly send a clear message to marketers, retailers and farmers in other states. Because whereas the State of Missouri is the first to ban the sale of 303 THF, chances are others will follow.
The results of the tests conducted on samples of the brands below meet the SAE J300 specifications for the SAE Viscosity Grade listed on the product label, and are consistent with the listed API Service Categories.
It should be noted, however, that the Par Mar API SN product does not display the API certification mark (donut) showing that it is an API licensed product.
The Petroleum Quality Institute of America (PQIA) heard from a number of readers after we published results on October 24th for the most recent SAE 5W-30 motor oils PQIA examined, and their comments shared common concerns. The first concern is why there are motor oils currently in the market labeled with API Service Categories no more recent than API SJ and SL.
In the views of some, such products should not be on retail shelves alongside with API SN motor oils. This is because they can easily be perceived by a reasonable consumer to meet the same specification as the majority of other motor oils in the market. Further, they say, since API SN motor oils are backward compatible, there is little reason to sell anything less, and by doing so may confuse the consumer.
The second concern focused on the fact that although some of the motor oils tested have labels with language that suggests the products meet an API Service Category (i.e. formulated to meet…), they do not explicitly state the product does, and/or does not display the API Donut certifying that it is licensed. Although there are no laws requiring that a motor oil is licensed by the API trade association, such licensing provides a level of assurance that the oil meets the performance requirements set by the API and subject to quality testing conducted by API’s Aftermarket Audit Program (AMAP).
The PQIA understands and shares the concerns expressed by its readers, and has and will continue to bring attention to these issues and work with the industry and others in an effort to address them.
At the same time, it remains very important for consumers to refer to their owner’s manual to determine what motor oil specifications their vehicle requires and match those requirements with the specifications on the label of the bottles they purchase. These specifications include SAE Viscosity Grade, API Service Category, and any applicable performance specifications specific to the vehicle manufacturer (i.e. General Motor’s dexos®).
In addition to the “Caring for Your Car – Engine Oil Timeline,” PQIA developed to help educate consumers about the American Petroleum Institute (API) Service Categories for passenger car motor oils, we now have a similar, and simple timeline designed to help educate consumers about the Service Categories for diesel engine oils.
API SERVICE CATEGORIES FOR PASSENGER CAR ENGINE OIL
Four More SAE 5W-30s
October 24, 2017
The results of the tests conducted on samples of the brands below meet the SAE J300 specifications for the SAE Viscosity Grade listed on the product label, and are consistent with the listed API Service Categories. It should be noted, however, that the Formula 300 API SL is formulated for use in 2004 and older gasoline-powered automotive engines, and the PolyGuard API SM is formulated for use in 2010 and older gasoline-powered automotive engines.
Furthermore, the PolyGuard API SM and the Formula 300 API SL products do not display the API certification mark (donut) showing that it is an API licensed product. As such, they are not subject to quality testing conducted by the API’s Aftermarket Audit Program (AMAP). This is a reminder to always read the front and back labels of the product you purchased to assure it meets the requirements for your vehicle (as shown in the owner’s manual).
CLICK BOTTLES BELOW FOR TEST RESULTS AND PQIA ASSESSMENTS
Two More Bad Apples!
October 6, 2017
In the day following the PQIA Lubricant Quality Summit on September 14th, PQIA stopped by several convenience stores located within a few blocks of the hotel where the Summit reception was held. To our disappointment, we found two products on the shelves that immediately raised concern due to labeling issues. And now that the test results are in, it’s clear that in addition to what’s on the labels being a concern, most concerning is what’s in the bottles. Consumers are advised that use of these product in virtually all automobiles currently on the road will likely cause harm to the engine.
CLICK BOTTLES BELOW FOR TEST RESULTS AND PQIA ASSESSMENTS
On another note, without response, PQIA extended an invitation to Ohio’s Department of Agriculture/Weights and Measures to attend the PQIA Summit and talk about the issues. We have and will continue to reach out to the state of Ohio about what can be done to protect consumers from off-spec, improperly labeled products sold in the state. We remain hopeful that they will take action.
The First PQIA Regional Lubricant Quality Summit was a Success!
September 29, 2017
With nearly 100 in attendance, the first regional PQIA Lubricant Quality Summit on September 14th, in Wickliffe, Ohio, was deemed a success by attendees, speakers, supporters, and sponsors.
The theme of the PQIA Summit was "Taking it to the Streets" and by all indications, it hit its mark by raising awareness about the quality and integrity of lubricants in the market and shining a light on both good and bad motor oils, transmission fluids and other lubricants.
Adding to that, the Summit included informative presentations from industry thought leaders about the new CK-4 and FA-4 diesel engine oil specifications, developments in PCMO to address pre-ignition in T/GDI engines, the growing complexity of ATFs, and concerns about the proliferation and dangers of obsolete tractor hydraulic fluid (THF) in the market.
Further a panel discussion spoke to what a growing number of lubricant manufacturers and marketers say is an issue that must be addressed; that being the
debasement of the terms From left to right: Douglas Rathbun, Robert DeRubeis, Ronald Hayes, and John Stegierwald"synthetic" and "synthetic blend" due to the absence of a technical definition or test to verify that a product is in fact a synthetic or blend.
Based on the attendance, Q&A exchanges, feedback PQIA received during and after the Summit, and a post event survey, it's clear the summit was a success. Attendees said they valued the diversity of the program, the highly relevant presentations and expertise of the speakers, and the opportunity to network with others in the lubricants industry.
The PQIA thanks its supporters, Lubrizol for hosting the first regional summit, event sponsors, speakers, and attendees for making this event a success.
ClickHEREto see the highlights from this dynamic Summit
Test Results in on Four
New Samples
September 29, 2017
The results of the tests conducted on samples of the brands below meet the SAE J300 specifications for the SAE Viscosity Grade listed on the product label, and are consistent with the listed API Service Categories.
CLICK BOTTLES BELOW FOR TEST RESULTS
SAE 5W-20 Motor Oil
The results of the tests conducted on samples of the brands below are consistent with their labeled claims.
CLICK BOTTLES BELOW FOR TEST RESULTS
Automatic
Transmission Fluid
Three Brands Tested: No Issues
August 24, 2017
The results of the tests conducted on samples of the brands below meet the SAE J300 specifications for the SAE Viscosity Grade listed on the product label, and are consistent with the listed API Service Categories.
CLICK BOTTLES BELOW FOR TEST RESULTS
Results in on Three More Diesel Engine Oils
July 26, 2017
The results of the tests conducted on the samples meet the SAE J300 specifications for the SAE Viscosity Grade listed on the product labels, and are consistent with the with the labeled specifications.
CLICK BOTTLES BELOW FOR TEST RESULTS
Shane O'Kelly, CEO of PetroChoice Joins PQIA Advisory Board
July 19, 2017
The Petroleum Quality Institute of America is pleased to announce a new member to PQIA's Advisory Board, Shane M. O'Kelly.
Shane O'Kelly, CEO PetroChoice
Shane is the Chief Executive Officer of PetroChoice, the largest bulk lubricant distributor in the United States. Under Shane's tenure, PetroChoice successfully completed 16 acquisitions and now has 51 locations serving 32 states. Shane holds an MBA from Harvard Business School and a bachelor of science from the United States Military Academy.
Thomas F. Glenn, President of PQIA, says "We decided recently to enhance and round out our advisory board with an additional seat for another lubricant distributor, and Shane is a perfect fit. He is a creative strategist who embodies the type of advisory board member necessary to advance PQIA's efforts to help assure the quality and integrity of lubricants in the marketplace."
The Petroleum Quality Institute of America's Advisory Board (AB) comprises a distinguished group of professionals with prominence in a broad range of fields in the lubricants business. The AB includes representatives from additive companies, major and independent lubricant manufacturers, and with Shane now coming on board, two of the country's largest lubricant distributors.
Shane O'Kelly is excited to join the board and says, "I am proud to be joining the Advisory Board and believe strongly in PQIA's role as a 'watchdog' in our industry. I look forward to supporting PQIA's mission of independently verifying the quality of lubricants in the market. It's critical that we collectively ensure that products being delivered to end customers meet the established standards and specifications."
The PQIA Advisory Board provides guidance, advice, and recommendations to PQIA's management to ensure a fair, equitable, rigorous, transparent and unbiased approach in the manner in which PQIA carries out its mission. In addition, the AB serves as an advocate of PQIA and its purpose and mission to lubricant industry stakeholders.
ABOUT PQIA The Petroleum Quality Institute of America is an independent resource for information and insights on the quality of lubricants in the marketplace. The company serves the consumer of lubricants by testing and reporting on the quality and integrity of lubricants in the marketplace.
More
ABOUT PETROCHOICE PetroChoice is a premier distributor of lubricants and services to thousands of companies in many states including Pennsylvania, Maryland, Ohio, Minnesota, Wisconsin, New Jersey, North Carolina, Florida, Tennessee, Kansas, Colorado, and Nebraska among others. The company distributes and offers its services from more than 50 locations in 32 states every day and include top brands of oils, greases, and other lubricants.
More
Dollar General Steps up to API SN/ILSAC GF-5
July 10, 2017
CLICK BOTTLE FOR DETAILS
As widely reported by PQIA and many local and national news outlets, including an ABC News – Good Morning America segment, the discount chain Dollar General is facing multiple lawsuits for selling “Obsolete” motor oil. The most recent of these lawsuits was filed last month by New Mexico’s Attorney General, Hector Balderas. The lawsuit alleges false advertising, unfair trade practices, and environmental public nuisance for the sale of obsolete motor oil in New Mexico stores from 2010 until February of this year.
Regardless of how the lawsuits are settled, there is some good news to report regarding the Dollar General (DG) branded motor oils. The PQIA has recently observed, from a relatively limited sampling of Dollar
General stores, that the company has upgraded its store brand (DG Auto) motor oils to the current API
SN/ILSAC GF-5 service category. The PQIA applauds Dollar General for making the change, and we remain hopeful that this CLICK BOTTLE FOR DETAILSaction has been implemented at all of its stores.
The PQIA recently purchased two samples (5W-30 and 10W-30) of the DG Auto brand motor oil label as meeting the API SN/GF-5 Service Category. The results of the tests conducted on the samples show that the products tested meet the SAE J300 specifications for the SAE Viscosity Grades shown on the labels and are consistent with the current API SN Service Category and ILSAC GF-5.
The results are in on four samples of 5W-20 motor oils. Although the results of the tests conducted on the samples meet the SAE J300 specifications for the SAE Viscosity Grade listed on the product label, and are consistent with the listed API Service Categories, one of the brands (Zecol-MAX) got our attention. This is because while the front label on the sample tested identifies the product as a "Synthetic SAE 5W-20 Motor Oil," the back label identifies it as a "Semi-Synthetic SAE 5W-20 Motor Oil." Once again, consumers are advised to read the labels when buying motor oils.
CLICK BOTTLES BELOW FOR TEST RESULTS
PQIA Releases National Survey Findings on ATF
June 21, 2017
METUCHEN, NJ - June 21, 2017 - The Petroleum Quality Institute of America (PQIA) today announced the findings of a national survey (Automatic Transmission Fluid - Survey 2017) focused on the quality and integrity of automatic transmission fluid (ATF) in the US market.
According to Thomas F. Glenn, President of PQIA, "The findings of the survey are eye-opening. They show that the lubricant industry and consumers recognize there are significant issues around quality and integrity of automatic transmission fluid in the US market and that action can and should be taken to address them."
Key findings from PQIA's survey reveal that off-spec, potentially transmission damaging ATFs are a significant issue in the minds of buyers and sellers of ATF, and misleading ATF labeling is the leading reason why. With that, Glenn says," The survey reveals an interesting dichotomy between the high levels of concern around labeling but a fairly low concern about actual quality. This suggests that if the industry can get labeling in order, there may not necessarily be significant issues with the quality of ATF in the market."
The Most Concerning Issues About ATFs in the Market
For those unfamiliar with ATF, it's a vital lubricant that performs many functions enabling a transmission to operate. Without ATF, nearly all cars on the road would come to a halt. But
as critical as ATF is to the proper operation of a vehicle, the PQIA survey reveals there is considerable confusion among buyers and sellers of ATF about the products in the market. This is because where Dexron® III/Mercon® fluids used to be the leading types of automatic transmission fluids (ATF) in the US market, these ATFs are being replaced by a splintering number of newer OEM specific ATF requirements, including ATF+4, Mercon V, Mercon LV, Dexron VI, ATF DW-1, ATF T-IV, SP-IV, Matic S and Matic D and K, Toyota ATF-WS, Honda DW (ZF), Diamond SP-IV, and others.
What used to be a fairly simple matter of selecting the right ATF for your car has become much more complicated. For these reasons, and others identified in PQIA's survey, the industry can and should do more to protect the interests of consumers, installers, and others buying and selling automatic transmission fluid. And from what the survey reveals, a good start is in educating buyers and sellers, and improving the labeling of ATFs in the market.
please click here.
The PQIA says the next step
is to turn the information
and insights from the survey
into action and it will do
so by taking the lead to
develop an ATF Quality
Improvement Leadership
Council comprising lubricant
and additive manufacturers
and distributors, OEMs,
installers, consumers,
industry associations, and
the media.
Contact Tom Glenn at PQIA if you would like to participate on the council.
Thank You to
Our Supporters
The PQIA thanks its
supporters for their
continuing contributions to
help assure the quality and
integrity of lubricants in
the market, and we would
like to once again
acknowledge their unwavering
commitment to quality and
protecting the interests of
the motoring public.
Result in on Four ATFs
and Five Antifreeze/Coolants,
and PQIA's Thought on the AAA's
Synthetic Motor Oil Report
June 19, 2017
The results of the tests
conducted on the most recent
samples of automatic
transmission fluid (ATF)
check out fine. The samples
are consistent with their
labeled claims.
Click Bottles for Details
A Look at Five More
Antifreeze/Coolants
Click Bottles for Details
PQIA's Thoughts on the
AAA's Synthetic Motor
Oil Report
The American Automobile
Association (AAA)
released a comprehensiveresearch
report announcing
that "synthetic oil
outperformed
conventional oil by an
average of nearly 50
percent in its
independent evaluation,
offering vehicles
significantly better
engine protection for
only $5 more per month
when following a
factory-recommended oil
change schedule."
The Petroleum
Quality Institute of
America applauds AAA's
efforts to help educate
consumers about motor
oils and found their
report to be very
interesting and
informative.
While PQIA
believes most would
agree that full
synthetics do provide a
higher level of engine
protection than
conventional motor oil,
and there is bench and
engine test data to
support such claims, the
devil is in the
details. And although
such details as the
brands tested, why they
were selected, and how
the AAA defines
"premium" among the
brands tested are not
made available in the
research report, these
are important factors to
consider. This is
particularly the case
with regards to the
definition of "premium"
since a number of motor
oil manufacturers now
offer three tiers of
synthetic motor oils,
including synthetics,
high mileage synthetics,
and synthetics offering
significant extensions
in oil change
intervals.
Further, PQIA
feels it is important to
note the following with
regards to the eight
industry-standard ASTM
(American Society for
Testing and Materials)
tests the AAA used to
evaluate the quality of
synthetics and
conventional engine
oils:
Some of the tests
in the study are highly
variable (i.e. MHT-4, 1
sigma can be as high as
15 units) and may not be
included in the upcoming
ILSAC GF-6
specification.
The TFOUT is not
an industry accepted
test because it does not
predict field
performance as opposed
to liking certain
chemistries. The test
has not been used as
part of ILSAC
Specifications which
began in the early
1990's.
The value of KO
Shear on a 5W-20 is
minimal since oils are
formulated at the top of
specification and rarely
shear out of grade, and
are typically
significantly above
minimum. Directionally,
however, a full
synthetic motor oil
would outperform a
conventional.
The TEOST 33
provides limited
information to support
claims about synthetics
out performing
conventional motor oils.
The Brookfield
test yields minimally
valued insights in the
performance differences
between synthetic and
conventional.
Another
important point for
consumers to consider is
that the AAA report
says "synthetic oil
outperformed conventional
oil by an average of nearly
50 percent in its
independent evaluation,
offering vehicles
significantly better engine
protection for only $5 more
per month when following a
factory-recommended oil
change schedule." PQIA
advises consumers that a key
part of this statement is "when
following a
factory-recommended oil
change schedule."
As such, it does not say
synthetic motor oils can
last 50% longer.
Again, PQIA applauds the AAA
for its efforts to
help educate consumers about
motor oils, and PQIA
understands there is bench
and engine test data to
support the advantages of
synthetics over conventional
motor oil.
The results of the tests conducted on the
four samples of SAE 5W-30 shown below meet the SAE J300 specifications for a SAE 5W-30 viscosity grade and are consistent with the API Service Categories shown on the labels.
CLICK BOTTLES FOR DETAILS
Five 5W-20s and They All Look Good
May 19, 2017
The results of the tests conducted on the five samples of SAE 5W-20 shown below meet the SAE J300 specifications a SAE 5W-20 viscosity grade and are consistent with the API Service Categories shown on the labels.
CLICK BOTTLES FOR DETAILS
Consumer Alerts Issued on Three "Q Motor Oil®" Viscosity Grades
May 11, 2017
Q Motor Oil 5•30, 10•40, and 10•30
The test results on samples of the
Q Motor Oil® brand indicate the products are NOT suitable for use in virtually all automobile engines currently on the road. Use of the products in automobile engines will likely cause harm to the engine. Similarly, although the back label on the products state “Suitable for Moderate Diesel Engines,” use of these products in diesel engines will likely cause harm to the engine.
CLICK BOTTLES FOR DETAILS
Results in on Five Brands of 5W-20
May 4, 2017
The results are in on five brands of 5W-20 and the tests conducted on the samples meet the SAE J300 specifications for the SAE Viscosity Grade listed on the product labels, and are consistent with the listed API Service Categories.
CLICK BOTTLES FOR DETAILS
Results in on Four API CK-4 Diesel Engine Oils
April 24, 2017
The results are in on the first four samples of diesel engine oil PQIA observed in the market labeled with the new API CK-4 performance specification. Each of the samples examined meet the SAE J300 specification for an SAE 15W-40 along with the phosphorus and Noack volatility requirements needed to meet the new API CK-4 specification. The results of other tests conducted on the samples are consistent with the listed API Service Categories.
CLICK BOTTLES FOR DETAILS
PQIA Enhances Website to Include User Friendly Search and Sort Features
April 24, 2017
Visitors to the PQIA website can now search and sort PQIA's sample database by brand, date of sample, SAE viscosity grade, API Service Category, and the PQIA Sample Assessments.
The search feature also provides a direct link to the analysis reports for each of the samples tested by PQIA.
The following is a Quick Start Guide to using the search and sort feature:
Five 0W-20s and They All Look Good
April 11, 2017
The results of the tests conducted on the five samples of SAE 0W-20 shown below meet the SAE J300 specifications a SAE 0W-20 viscosity grade and are consistent with the API Service Categories shown on the labels.
A Look at the 0W-20s Examined by PQIA in 2014 to 2017(YTD)
April 11, 2017
Although SAE 5W-30 accounts for the majority of the passenger car motor oil (PCMO) consumed in the US, demand for the grade continues to decline as some of the leading Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs) shift to lower viscosity grade PCMOs in an effort to improve fuel economy. The biggest beneficiary of the shift is SAE 0W-20. Currently accounting for roughly 10% of PCMO consumed in the US, demand for the 0W-20 viscosity grade is expected to nearly triple over the next 10 years. Because of this, the PQIA will be examining an increasing number of 0W-20s moving forward as more of these products populate retail shelves.
CLICK FOR MORE.
Next Up: CK-4 and FA-4 Diesel Engine Oils
April 11, 2017
The PQIA has received a significant number of inquiries from readers asking if and when PQIA will take a look at the new CK-4 and FA-4 diesel engine oils. The answer is “yes” we will be looking at both as they enter the market and PQIA already has samples in the laboratory for testing. Results for the first group of samples will be published in the next two weeks.
CLICK FOR MORE.
PQIA Examines Five Brands of ATF, One Has Issues
March 24, 2017
The PQIA Examines Five Automatic Transmission Fluid (ATF) Brands and Issues an Advisory on One
The results of the tests conducted on samples of MidWest Guard, NaviGuard, SuperS Custom Plus, and Vantage shown below meet the requirements for DEXRON® III/MERCON®.
The sample of
PolyGuard tested does not meet the specification for a Type A transmission fluid, as the product is labelled. In addition, Type A Automatic Transmission Fluid is obsolete and not suitable for use in automatic transmissions manufactured after 1957. The label on this product does not provide any warning to consumers about this limited use.
PQIA Examines Four More Motor Oil Samples, All Check Out Fine
March 17, 2017
The results of the tests conducted on the samples below meet the SAE J300 specifications for the SAE Viscosity Grade listed on their product label, and are consistent with their listed API Service Categories.
The PQIA Examines Five Automatic Transmission Fluid (ATF) Brands
and Issues an Advisory on One
March 9, 2017
Advisory: The MORGAS ATF D/M label states that the product is suitable for use in transmissions where DEXRON® III or MERCON® is specified. PQIA’s test results for this sample do not meet the DEXRON III and MERCON specification for Flash Point and Kinematic Viscosity at 100ºC. CLICK FOR DETAILS
Note: This is not the first time PQIA has found issues with this brand. In fact, on February 24, 2017, PQIA issued a
Consumer Alert on MORGAS SAE 5W-20 motor oil.
The Other Four ATFs; No Issues
The results of the tests conducted on samples of the brands shown below meet the requirements for DEXRON® III/MERCON®.
PQIA is pleased to announce an enhancement to the reports it issues on the brands tested. The enhancement is in direct response to those who have visited the PQIA website and asked us to include a visual representation of the critical test data tied to specifications.
Moving forward, in addition to the actual test data PQIA shows on the reports, the sample report pages now include horizontal bar charts showing where the sample test data falls relative to specifications. Click on the bottles in this newsletter to see the graphics in action.
PQIA Examines Five Samples of 5W-20; Issues One Consumer Alert, One Advisory
FEBRUARY 24, 2017
MORGAS SAE 5W-20
The results of the tests conducted on this sample do NOT meet the SAE J300 specifications for the SAE Viscosity Grade listed on the product label, and are NOT consistent with the listed API Service Category.
The Kinematic Viscosity @ 100°C is 14% lower than the minimum viscosity specification for this SAE grade. In addition, the Volatility result is substantially higher than the maximum allowed in the SN specification.
It should also be noted that the back label states this product "is compatible with SN, SM, SL and ILSAC GF-5 service classification." when in fact it does not meet any of these specifications.
Use of this product in the majority of vehicles on the road today may cause unsatisfactory engine performance.
CLICK FOR MORE
SuperS Custom Plus SAE 5W-20 SJ
Advisory: The results of the tests conducted on this sample meet the SAE J300 specifications for the SAE Viscosity Grade listed on the product label, and are consistent with the API SJ Service Category. It should be noted, however, that API SJ motor oils are intended for use in vehicles built prior to 2002. Although not stated on the labels, consumers should be aware of its limited use. Further, whereas the labels state, "For use where an SJ motor oil is recommended," and "is compatible with API approved engine oils," the labels do not claim this product actually meets any API Service Categories.
The high level of silicon in this sample is unusual and may indicate contamination with abrasive material.
CLICK FOR MORE
Other 5W-20s Recently Examined
The results of the tests conducted on samples of the brands shown below meet the SAE J300 specifications for the SAE Viscosity Grade listed on the product labels, and are consistent with the listed API Service Categories.
CLICK BOTTLES FOR DETAILS
Five More Samples From the Midwest-Consumer Alert Issued on One
FEBRUARY 6, 2017
PQIA examines five more motor oil samples purchased in the midwest and issues a Consumer Alert on one and an Advisory on another. Cautions consumer not to Buy SUPER XXX Platinum 10W30.
Consumer Alert: A Consumer Alert is issued on SUPER XXX Platinum “10W30 API SM/GF-3” manufactured by Chi-Town Lubricants located in Dolton, IL. The results of the tests conducted on the sample DO NOT meet the SAE J300 specifications for an SAE 10W-30 viscosity grade, and ARE NOT consistent with the referenced API SM Service Category. Use of this product in automobile engines may cause harm to most vehicles currently on the road.
CLICK FOR DETAILS
Advisory: An Advisory is issued on PolyGUARD All Season 5W-30 API SF/CC manufactured in PolyGuard Products Division located in Medina, MN. The reason for the Advisory is that the product is labeled as meeting an OBSOLETE API Service Category (SF/CC) and the labels fail to give consumers adequate warning about its potential harm to more modern engines. With regards to the API SF Service Category, the API states: “CAUTION: Not suitable for use in most gasoline-powered automotive engines built after 1988. May not provide adequate protection against build-up of engine sludge.”
CLICK FOR DETAILS
Other motor oils examined in the most recent round of samples from the mid-west region are shown below:
PQIA Issues Consumer Alerts on Two AntiFreeze/Coolant Samples
JANUARY 27, 2017
Two of the five coolant/antifreeze samples recently examined by PQIA fail to meet their label claims for freeze point protection.
Polar Zone: Test results on the sample of Polar Zone examined has a freeze point of -2.2°F. This freeze point is above the labeled claim stating “Protects to -20°F,” and well above the industry standard of -33.5°F. In addition, the pH at 12.12 is 1.12 higher than required to meet the ASTM D-3306 specification.
Super XXX: The freeze point of the product tested is -15°F. This is higher than the product’s labeled claim of -34°F and is higher than the industry standard of -33.5°F. The test results are not consistent with a new coolant based on the standard specifications stated in ASTM D-3306 and ASTM D-4985. The level of degradation acids (glycolate and formate) in the sample tested are unusually high. In addition, the concentration of chloride is 228% higher than the maximum level of 25mg/L as stated in ASTM D-3306 and ASTM D-4985 for a new coolant.
Antifreeze/coolants recently tested by PQIA that are consistent with the labeled claims:
Note: Major Brands Oil Company contacted PQIA saying that the results of the tests conducted on its product in 2015 were not reflective of the company’s current quality and encouraged PQIA to proactively test its Performance Antifreeze & Coolant currently in the market. PQIA did so and purchased products from two locations in Michigan. Click Performance jugs above for test results on the samples.
Smitty’s Supply to Pay $755,155 in Consumer Protection Settlement
JANUARY 27, 2017
The Orange County District Attorney’s Office has obtained a consumer protection settlement against a Louisiana Company, Smitty’s Supply, Inc.
Based on random product testing conducted by the California Department of Food and Agriculture (CDFA), Division of Measurement Standards (DMS) that began in 2012, it was determined that samples of Smitty’s Custom Plus™ Motor Oil products sold within the State of California “did not meet the specifications represented on the label.”
The Final Judgement states that “There were several violations for selling, or offering for sale, petroleum or automotive products of a different grade than represented on the label and adulterated or mislabeled product that does not meet the latest automotive manufacturer’s recommended requirements as indicated on the label.”
The total settlement was in the amount of $751,155. This includes civil penalties of $555,000, investigative and other costs of $196,155.
In addition to the $751,155, the Final Judgment and Permanent Injunction requires Smitty’s to develop and implement a quality assurance program to ensure that the lubricants it sells or distributes in the state of California comply with industry standards and all state and federal laws. The QA program must also include that Smitty’s places a traceable date and batch number of every product to assure that the quantity and location of products sold or distributed in California can be traced.
Importantly, the quality assurance program must also be maintained in writing and explained to Smitty’s employees involved in the management, blending, testing, packaging, transportation and others involved with its lubricant products. Further, they must acknowledge, by signature, that they will abide by the QA program requirements.
PQIA examines five samples of automatic transmission fluid purchased in the Midwest market. While the results of the tests conducted on three of the samples meet the requirements for their labeled claims, PQIA issues Consumer Alerts/Don’t Buys on two. The two samples are branded under names all too familiar to PQIA. One is the Everclear brand ATF. This is the fourteenth time PQIA has issued Consumer Alerts on lubricants marketed under the Everclear brand. Further, this product has been ordered off the shelves in the states of Georgia and North Carolina.
/span>
The Petroleum Quality Institute of America is able to serve buyers and consumers of lubricants in part through the support of
lubricant manufacturers, marketers, and others. Please contact us at the link below if you too would like to sponsor PQIA's efforts to help assure the quality of lubricants in the marketplace.
Click here to contact us about how you can help supporter PQIA's
efforts or call us at
732-201-4033
The result of the tests conducted on samples of these brands show products that can cause harm to virtually any car or truck currently on the road.
The Petroleum Quality Institute of America (PQIA) has been analyzing engine oil samples since 2009. Over that time, we have tested many brands, the majority of which have no issues; they meet their viscosity claims and are consistent with the API Service Categories on the labels. Unfortunately, however, we have also seen a significant number of brands with deficiencies, and some that are so far off the mark they will cause harm to engines. While PQIA will continue to inform consumers about motor oils that have no issues, and those that fail to meet their claims and/or can cause equipment harm, this article is written to help educate consumers about an important change taking place in motor oils they should be aware of. This change speaks to the new API SN Plus Service Category for passenger car motor oils (PCMO) and how it will likely be seen in the sample analysis data PQIA reports.
As reported by PQIA on February 12, 2018, the Georgia Department of Agriculture, Fuel and Measures Division issued a Stop Sale Order for Tractor Hydraulic Fluid (THF) products in the market labeled, claimed or implied as only meeting the THF “303” designation. The department determined that all THF 303 labeled products shall be removed from sale in Georgia within 180 days of the date of the order.
The Petroleum Quality Institute of America (PQIA) received a number of phone calls over the past month about some of the new labels seen on pails of Tractor Hydraulic Fluid (THF) in the two states (Georgia and Missouri) that issued stop sale orders on "303" tractor hydraulic fluid. Of concern is that although stop sale orders have been issued, the new labels continue to display "303." The PQIA looked into this and here is what we found.
The Georgia Department of Agriculture, Fuel & Measures Division has issued a Stop Sale Order for Tractor Hydraulic Fluids (THF) products in the market labeled, claimed or implied as meeting the THF "303" specification.
The California Department of Food & Agriculture (CDFA) published an excellent document this month that’s a must read for lubricant stakeholders doing business in the state. It’s also an invaluable resource for those looking to understand some of the laws and regulations that are embodied in the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Handbook 130, which are in effect in other states.
The John Deere (JD) 303 designation is 57 years old and has been obsolete for 43 years. In addition, there are no specifications available for 303 THF, and as such products making only “303” claims cannot be tested to assure compliance with any known specifications. Because of this, in the interest of protecting consumers, the State of Missouri ordered that “303” THF cannot be sold in the state.
The Petroleum Quality Institute of America's Advisory Board (AB) comprises a distinguished group of professionals with prominence in a broad range of fields in the lubricants business. The AB includes representatives from additive companies, major and independent lubricant manufacturers, and with Shane now coming on board, two of the country's largest lubricant distributors.
According to Thomas F. Glenn, President of PQIA, "The findings of the survey are eye-opening. They show that the lubricant industry and consumers recognize there are significant issues around quality and integrity of automatic transmission fluid in the US market and that action can and should be taken to address them."
Although SAE 5W-30 accounts for the majority of the passenger car motor oil (PCMO) consumed in the US, demand for the grade continues to decline as some of the leading Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs) shift to lower viscosity grade PCMOs in an effort to improve fuel economy. The biggest beneficiary of the shift is SAE 0W-20. Currently accounting for roughly 10% of PCMO consumed in the US, demand for the 0W-20 viscosity grade is expected to nearly triple over the next 10 years. Because of this, the PQIA will be examining an increasing number of 0W-20s moving forward as more of these products populate retail shelves.
